Oh, I could be very partisan and talk about the hypocrisy surrounding this story:
Unborn babies soaked in chemicals
But the fact is, this information is just being released. The hypocrisy you ask?
The hypocrisy would be that those same individuals who talk about the unborn fetus as a human being with rights also defend the industries that disregard laws allowing pollutants into the environment that harm these same unborn human beings with rights.
But I'm stepping back. There isn't any hypocrisy. At least not yet. If these revelations about how the environment affects the unborn result in no changes towards the legislation of laws related to the EPA, then I would begin screaming hypocrisy. But it's too early to do that with any integrity.
2 comments:
Why wait to scream hypocrisy? Isn't that what the right would do off the bat?
Hypocrisy is what it is. We all know now that chemicals from the environment contaminate breast milk. Why would anyone not extend that to a logical conclusion?
Hypocrisy isn't being sown, it's harvested.
Are chemicals Pro-Life?
Post a Comment